Category: Kitchen Sink

Privacy! when you “have nothing to hide”

One of the more challenging areas of restraint for me is when someone rationalizes unbridled access to someone else’s information by arguing, “Well, if you don’t have anything to hide, you shouldn’t have any objection.”

What could it hurt?

Naïvely, and, more importantly — dangerously — this position fails to recognize the difference between data and intelligence. The former is raw, unconsidered information. The latter adds interpretation to that record of the former.

So, to you and me, “667 Main Street, Apartment 16,” is just an address. But coded into a database that runs character strings without spaces, apartment information preceding building, the number “16667” appears in a string. And it’s only a matter of time before some intelligence person sees the three of those sixes together in an apartment-first, street-second layout, and draws “the only possible conclusion,” ie, “mark of the devil!”

Stop and think about some of the best thriller-genre story lines. “Mistaken identity” is really nothing more than otherwise innocent data being taken the wrong way. Happens all the time.

And, as a matter of fact, so much so, I’m guessing, that folks who were here long before me and undoubtedly a lot smarter than I am, felt it important enough to spell out as a prohibition.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

As arguments go, Fourth Amendment trumps rationalization for riffling through my underwear drawer. At least as far as I’m concerned.

How ’bout you?

The Word is “horology”

horology

  1. the science of measuring time
  2. the art of making instruments for indicating time

Merriam-Webster

With apologies to my fellow members of the National Association of Watch & Clock Collectors, I rather fancy this word mostly because of how it sounds and behavior that the ignorant assume it to reference.

Quoting Joseph Joubert, on choosing a marriage partner

Choose in marriage only a woman who you would choose as a friend if she were a man.

Will “Le Chiffre” become a verb?

Spoiler alert: While it’s hard to imagine that the torture scene in Casino Royale is much of a surprise to anyone, that’s what we’re talking about here. So, stop reading here if that sort of discussion might spoil anything for you.

For the rest of us— I wanted to let you know that the words, “Don’t Le Chiffre me” have already crossed my lips since seeing the latest James Bond 007 film feature yesterday. It’s a guy thing, calling someone on what is, I admit, usually a mere verbal jibe.

Nothing physical, let alone below-the-belt. Thank God!

To be “La Chiffred” (pronounced “la-sheef-ed”) connotes the even greater context conveyed through the Casino Royale torture scene. La Chiffre is an opponent who cheats to get the upper hand. He attacks only after his henchmen have secured position on his behalf. Then, with no sense of boundaries, come his low blows, so to speak.

James Bond 007, secure in his masculinity and unyielding to such an unworthy opponent, mocks Le Chiffre.*

This is the the fullest message conveyed when labeling your experience at the hand of an adversary has La Chiffred. For the perpetrator, clearly a moniker of shame.

Application:

It can unmask behavior, call it to account, suggesting the question, “You’ve crossed a line. Do you really want to go there?” Or, more harshly, “You’ve already passed the point of no return: Stop before your friends see you scratching around in a way that’s more humiliating to you than anyone else.”

When you see La Chiffred appear in context elsewhere, remember that you read about it here, first.

____________
* An oversimplification I reserve the right to address later, elsewhere; necessary here to keep this article on topic.

Quoting Kurt Vonnegut, Jr, on speaking the truth (in love)

‘Don’t truth me,’ said Boaz …, ‘and I won’t truth you.’

— The Sirens of Titan

 

Quoting “Psychology Today,” on validating self-esteem

Many parents try so hard to boost ‘self-esteem’ that they forget where it comes from. We feel good about ourselves when we’re effective in the world. Help your son acquire the skills and knowledge he needs to succeed ….

An inflated sense of self-worth without underlying abilities is useless, if not dangerous.

Dr Robert Epstein, PhD

Quoting “The Marketing Imagination,” on suitability

Excellent quality is not enough. Also required is suitability. In pursuit of wrong purposes, excellence is wrong.

Employing gas spectroscopy is overkill when a simple microscope will accomplish the task. Using a simulation model to determine the optimal warehouse network may be excellent management science, but you’ll realize it’s ridiculous if you just stop to think. Common sense will suggest that you’ll need a warehouse in the New York metropolitan area, probably one between Washington and Philadelphia, one around Atlanta, around Chicago, around Houston-Dallas, in Los Angeles-San Francisco, in the Pacific Northwest, and somewhere on a line between Denver and Minneapolis. How much scientific accuracy do you need? Your imagination can tell you in a moment a great deal more than scientific excellence would have told you at great expense and pretension in a year ….

… the explanations of the superior performance that we commonly get from the most successful practitioners of capitalist enterprise, though perhaps quite accurate in themselves, are seldom more than confessions of particular experiences, offering no comparison with the experiences of others and devoid of serious analytical content. What they lack, moreover, in generality they often compensate with pomposity.

— Theodore Levitt

Review: “Controlled Experiment,” The Outer Limits

Life can radically change in a matter of seconds. Consequences ripple beyond our wildest anticipation.

What if you could stop that moment and study it?

That’s the premise of this exceptional episode of The Outer Limits. Earth is being monitored by subtly-placed operatives from a highly intelligent, advanced race of Martians. It’s been a quiet job for our man in the field, “Diemos,” who’s blended-in among us by passing himself off as a nondescript pawn shop proprietor.

But now he’s been ordered to give complete cooperation to a superior from Mars, “Inspector Phobos.” A “controlled experiment” has been authorized to help Mars understand the motives, nature, and consequences of murder.

Not a big deal in and of itself.

But what if it led to something more serious?

So we’re going to take a close look. “Martian Computer Control Probability Division” has projected with 99% certainty that one of these will occur just four blocks from Diemos’ storefront.

The setup for “Controlled Experiment” is at once creative, charming, and straightforward. The science fiction fan will be appeased, yet those who might otherwise avoid the genre are at no risk of getting lost or bored with the gadgetry of it. A suitcase-sized “Miniaturized Temporal Condenser” serves as the touchstone device for capturing real-life events a’la present day VCR. No antennae or silly makeup for these alien visitors here either, respecting the audience’s ability to accept the setup without going over the top.

Initial finding? The motive for this murder is jealousy, and the fatal shot is fired by a drop-dead gorgeous blond staked out in a hotel lobby awaiting arrival of her philandering boyfriend via elevator.

He steps out. Words are exchanged.

Bang!

Dead.

Can that be all there is to it?

The richness of this story is in the characters, their emotions and their growth. Diemos exhibits authentic deference to his superior that rings true of just about any organizational hierarchy. Timeless.

Yet there’s something else here, too. A warmth and genuine desire to bridge the culture gaps between his home planet of Mars and the people of Earth, in a personal way, for Phobos. Before leaving the pawn shop, Diemos introduces Inspector Phobos to Earth indulgences of coffee and cigarettes. The latter with a pitch so enthusiastic that borders on needing a Surgeon General’s Warning.

Further into the plot, there’s a bit in the hotel lobby where Diemos softly corrects Phobos on a local idiosyncrasy — and his superior thanks him. True respect in a way you seldom see among the Dilbert-style bosses of the real world, struggling to impersonate behavior they took notes on during last weeks “team” training.

Humor dialogue is spot-on as well; no laugh track, and never gratuitous. Here’s how the plot is advanced through a question regarding the role played by others in the hotel lobby vis-à-vis the murder.

“Ah, yes,” Diemos answers in perfect deadpan. “They’re ‘innocent bystanders.’ It’s a tradition. Each one tells a different version of what happened.”

Later, as Phobos’ confusion mounts at the senselessness of murder, he and Diemos follow the boyfriend backward in time — up the elevator and back to the lips of another woman.

Passionate one moment, dead the next?

This makes no sense to the inspector.

“The only scientific law that applies to kissing and shooting is the principle of uncertainty,” muses Diemos.

As special effects go, the Miniaturized Temporal Condenser can be a bit over the top with its screeching, bright lights; acting, too, is in some scenes a bit over the top. But if your inner-nitpicker  can be quelled, I would argue that the impact fundamentally shows the effort and seriousness involved in manipulating time under any circumstances.

So it’s not Rod Taylor in The Time Machine or Doc Brown in his DeLorean?

Nope. Nor does it have to be.

The bigger risk in a plot like this is getting through buildup to the final act without failing to deliver. We studied murder, motive, and means, but something’s gotta pay us off for having invested the time in this.

No worries. The Outer Limits shines throughout its “Controlled Experiment.” Twice. I won’t spoil the ending, but I will leave you with one of the two questions that sets it up.

What if you could make it so the murder never happened?

  • Overall grade: A
  • Engaging look at motives, assumptions, and actions — with a strong and clever “What if?” finish.

Production

The Outer Limits, “Controlled Experiment (1963), Leslie Stevens. Written and directed by Leslie Stevens. Starring Barry Morse (Inspector Phobos), Carroll O’Connor (Diemos), and Grace Lee Whitney.

“Kitchen Sink”

If you’re familiar with the phrase, “everything but the kitchen sink,” then you’ll get the approach I’ve taken here in labeling my personal Blog Posts.

Note on Categories: Each post appears in only one Category; nothing is referenced in more than one Category below.

Tags are a different story.

— Dell Deaton
December 31, 2005

rev December 6, 2021; November 5, 2021; February 3, 2017

Quoting JR Ewing, on Eulogizing Jock Ewing

JR Ewing (Larry Hagman):

I’m sorry, Daddy. I let you down. I just flat gave up.

Back there at that swamp — you were gone. It was all over. Didn’t seem like there was anything worth going on for for me.

And I almost forgot—.

You left us something; you left us the company. You built Ewing Oil from the ground up. And whatever it took — you did it for Ewing Oil. And I’m gonna do the same. I’m gonna pass it on bigger and stronger to my son.

I’m back, Daddy.

And nobody’s gonna take Ewing Oil away from me, or my son, or his son.

“I swear to you: By God, I’m gonna make you proud’a me.

Leonard Katzman, Dallas